|
Q: Can
pumpkin seeds help keep the prostate healthy or combat the symptoms
of an enlarged prostate? H.S., VIA THE INTERNET
A: They have been used
to treat male urinary problems for centuries, and there is some
evidence that pumpkin seed oil and extract can make urine flow
more easily. But no study has shown that pumpkin seeds can actually
maintain prostate health—that is, prevent enlargement of
the prostate.
Pumpkin seeds are a healthy, tasty snack. Plain roasted
seeds have 148 calories and 12 grams of healthy fat per ounce.
They also have 14 milligrams of vitamin E (93% of the RDA) per
ounce, as well as thiamin and folate (B vitamins), magnesium, iron,
and zinc.

Q: Are
starch-blocking pills a safe and effective way to diet? M.R.,
VIA THE INTERNET
A: No. These products,
such as Carb Crusher, Starch Away, and Slender Now System, claim
that you can eat all you want and still lose weight—provided
you take these pills, at a cost of $50 to $100 a month. The idea
is that the pills block starch digestion. For example, if you ate
cereal containing 240 calories and took a starch blocker, you’d
absorb only 26 of the calories, or so the sellers claim. The pills
usually contain an extract of white kidney beans, a protein compound
that blocks an enzyme in the intestine (alpha amylase) and keeps
it from breaking down starch, as it normally would do. Thus, in
theory, the starch passes into your large intestine and is excreted.
Manufacturers cite lab studies to support their claims,
but no human studies on these products have yet been published—and
most investigators are involved financially with the manufacturers.
The idea of starch-blocking may sound logical—and it’s
impossible to say that the pills have no effect at all. But the
protein in the pill, or most of it, is itself probably digested
before it can block anything. Starch digestion begins in the mouth,
and continues in the small intestine. Another problem: the body
is likely to produce more alpha amylase than a pill could block.
Still another is that undigested starch in your large intestine
would cause gas, bloating, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Customers
who complain of such symptoms are told it’s a sign that the
pills work.
Starch blockers are nothing new—the FDA took
several such products off the market in the 1980s. There actually
is an FDA-approved prescription drug (acarbose, brand name Precose)
that does slow starch digestion. It is used only for people with
diabetes as a means of blocking a rapid rise in blood sugar. Its
effects are moderate, and it does not lead to weight loss. Side
effects include gas and diarrhea.
No one, particularly people with
diabetes, should take starch blockers sold over the counter.

Q: Is
it true that having gum disease puts me at higher risk for a
heart attack? L.R., VIA THE INTERNET
A: Maybe. Some (but
not all) studies suggest there’s a link between periodontal
(gum) disease and cardiovascular disease. But that doesn’t
necessarily mean that gum disease is actually a cause of heart
disease and strokes. It may merely suggest that you are at increased
risk—and even that isn’t certain.
One new study, in the journal Stroke, found that
older people who had lost more than 10 teeth tended to have more
plaque in the main arteries in the neck leading to the brain—a
major risk factor for stroke—compared to those who lost fewer
teeth. Tooth loss is a sign of long-term gum disease (current gum
disease, oddly enough, was not linked to arterial plaque). Another
recent study, from Harvard, looked at more than 40,000 men and
found a link between tooth loss, as well as current periodontal
disease, and stroke. Since some things that increase the risk of
gum disease—such as age, smoking, and diabetes—also
increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, these studies controlled
for such factors.
There are many theories, some quite complicated,
to explain a possible link. Notably, periodontal disease, a bacterial
infection of the gums, may trigger inflammation elsewhere in the
body, and chronic inflammation is now thought to contribute to
atherosclerosis (plaque formation in the arteries that leads to
coronary artery disease and stroke). A simpler explanation may
be that people who take good care of their teeth and gums may have
a more healthful diet and have better health habits in general,
which in turn may help prevent heart attack and stroke.
So take
good care of your teeth and gums. It may help you live longer

Q: Are
knock knees a problem for exercise? S.T., LOS ANGELES
A: Yes, they can be.
People who are signi-ficantly knock-kneed are at increased risk
for a variety of injuries when running or doing other high-impact
exercise. Many people are somewhat knock-kneed, and depending on
the severity, this can put added strain on the hips, knees, lower
legs, ankles, and feet. A problem for knock-kneed runners is that
this can make their feet roll inward too much (overpronate). To
see if you are knock-kneed, stand straight with your feet hip-width
apart and look in a mirror: if your kneecaps are not aligned with
the center of your feet and turn inward, you have some degree of
knock knee.
If you have knock knees (or are bowlegged) and are
thinking about running or starting another high-impact activity,
you might want to talk to an orthopedist or physical therapist.
You may need to get orthotic devices for your shoes, start a special
exercise program, or perhaps avoid high-impact exercise altogether.
Cycling and swimming are safer alternatives.

Q: Raw
fish isn’t safe because it may contain parasites. What
about lox and nova? R.L, NEW YORK CITY
A: It’s highly
unlikely that these forms of commercially preserved salmon pose
any danger. Lox is heavily salted, but not smoked. Nova (so called
because Nova Scotia is a major source of salmon) is cold-smoked
and less heavily salted. Salting does kill parasites, but theoretically
they could survive cold-smoking. There have been no reports of
parasitic infection from commercial lox or nova, as far as we could
find. Furthermore, cold-smoked salmon is almost always frozen after
smoking, which also kills parasites.
UC Berkeley Wellness Letter, February
2004

|