| 
Homeopathic
remedies
Claims, Benefits: A kinder
and gentler alternative to modern high-tech medicine. Whatever causes
disease can also cure it, though all it takes is extremely diluted doses.
Bottom Line: There is no
solid scientific evidence that homeopathy works—and no plausible
reason to think that it could work.
Full Article, Wellness Letter, February 2006:
Distilling the Truth About Homeopathy In the
10 years since the Wellness Letter last looked at homeopathy, this form
of alternative medicine has become more popular—and
more controversial—than ever. Its supporters say homeopathy plays
a unique role in the treatment of virtually all diseases, and they
often accuse M.D.s of closed-mindedness and greed. Mainstream medicine
looks at homeopathy as nonscientific nonsense—if not an outright
scam. Just about every year studies on homeopathy appear, and headlines
announcing proof that it works alternate with those sounding its death
knell. What do we really know about homeopathy? Claims and principles Homeopathy (from the
Greek homeo, meaning similar, and pathos, meaning suffering)
was developed two hundred years ago by Samuel Hahnemann, a
German physician who believed that whatever caused disease would also
cure it: “like cures like.” For example, his theory was that
since cinchona bark (which contains quinine, a known treatment for malaria)
produces the symptoms of malaria in a healthy person, quinine in minuscule
doses will cure malaria. Homeopathy was an alternative to the harsh “cures” of
those days, such as blistering, purging, and bloodletting. In that era,
when most doctoring did little or no good, it’s not hard to see
why many people turned to homeopathy. A second homeopathic principle is
that an illness is specific to an individual. The choice of remedy is
based not only on the symptoms, but also on the
patient’s emotional state, lifestyle, and other factors. Thus,
two people with the same ailment may well receive different treatments. Another principle—the hardest for scientific
medicine to swallow—is
that the more a remedy is diluted, the more potent it is. Homeopathic
solutions typically are diluted at least one million times: one molecule
of “remedy” to more than one million, or even billion, water
molecules. The preparations are produced via serial dilution—a
solution is diluted 10 times, and then one part is taken and the process
repeated again and again. Some remedies are diluted to such unimaginable
degrees as one molecule of “medicine” to 10-60 molecules
of water (that’s a 1 followed by 60 zeroes, equal to an ocean of
water). The original substance would, in effect, disappear. These mixtures
are
supposed to be vigorously shaken (“succussed”) in a prescribed
manner in order to activate them. Homeopaths claim that even when the
substance is reduced to only one molecule, or lost altogether, its “pattern” or “vital
essence” remains in the liquid (or sometimes tablets) and can produce
an effect. Of course, the notion that a single molecule, let alone the “memory” of
a molecule, could have any effect flies in the face of science as well
as common sense. The rise and fall and rise of homeopathy Homeopathy
flourished in the nineteenth century, but by around 1900 it was largely
displaced by medical practice founded on recent scientific
advances (notably Pasteur’s germ theory, the development of antiseptic
techniques, and the discovery of ether anesthesia) and clinical training.
Homeopathy never died out, however, especially in France, Germany, and
England. Many French medical doctors include some form of homeopathy
in their practice, and some British physicians refer patients to homeopaths
(perhaps influenced by members of the royal family who believe in homeopathy).
In India, Mexico, and some other countries homeopathy is part of the
national health-care system. Crucial for the future of homeopathy in
the U.S., in 1938 the Pure Food and Drug Act (written in part by a Senator
who was also a homeopath)
specifically exempted homeopathic remedies from meeting the “safe
and effective” requirements of the Food and Drug Administration. The current revival In the 1970s homeopathy
started to thrive again in the U.S., and today there are thousands of
practitioners here. Often they are naturopaths,
chiropractors, or acupuncturists. Though there are voluntary certification
programs, nearly anybody can set up shop as a homeopath—in many
states all you need to take is a short course. Arizona, Connecticut,
and Nevada license medical doctors for homeopathy, but only a few hundred
American M.D.s practice homeopathy. Most often, though, people take homeopathic
products on their own, or on the advice of a salesperson in a store,
without consulting a practitioner. Some people are attracted to homeopathy
because they see it as a kinder and gentler alternative to modern high-tech
medicine. Its preparations
are not painful or frightening, are invariably labeled “natural,” and
are unlikely to have side effects because they are so extremely diluted.
Its practitioners tend to spend a lot of time talking to patients, and
claim to treat the person, not the disease. What could be wrong with
all that? The fact remains, there is no solid scientific evidence
that homeopathy works—and no plausible reason to think that it
could work. Diluting the evidence? In recent years various
homeopathic remedies for conditions such as allergies, migraines, colds,
and diarrhea have undergone clinical trials, some claiming
positive results. Often these studies were published with great hoopla
and then inevitably torn apart by other researchers for good reason (poor
study design, small number of subjects, subjective outcomes, and/or results
that could not be replicated). Most studies, in fact, have had negative
results. There have been no published controlled studies on homeopathic
treatments for chronic diseases such as cancer, hypertension, or diabetes. Several reviews of the overall research on
homeopathy have concluded that few studies were well designed. Recently
a review in the Lancet
concluded that of 110 placebo-controlled studies, the large well-designed
trials almost always found that homeopathy worked no better than a placebo.
That is, when subjects benefited, it was because of the placebo effect. The National Center for Complementary and
Alternative Medicine says that “the
results of individual, controlled clinical trials of homeopathy have
been contradictory . . . systematic reviews have not found homeopathy
to be a definitively proven treatment for any medical condition.” Some
proponents claim that modern scientific methods can’t explain
or evaluate homeopathy. We believe, however, that all treatments should
be supported by science-based evidence. Words to the wise If you have a chronic disorder
and your doctor can’t help you,
you can hardly be blamed for seeking alternatives. But stop and think.
Are you certain of your diagnosis? Have you sought a second or even third
opinion? We don’t recommend consulting a homeopath
or buying homeopathic remedies. But if you do, keep these points in mind:
• Except
for the ghostly molecules, homeopathic products may contain nothing
more than water or alcohol. Thus they
are unlikely to harm you.
The FDA has rules about the labeling of homeopathic products, but you
really can’t be sure what’s in the bottle.
• Though
this goes against a basic principle of homeopathy and is probably rare,
some products labeled “homeopathic” are only slightly
diluted and thus do contain significant amounts of active ingredients.
In that case, there certainly could be side effects. For instance,
the FDA has received reports that the cold remedy Zicam, a popular
homeopathic
nasal gel, contains enough zinc gluconate to cause loss of smell. And
there have been documented cases of serious adverse effects caused
by inadequately diluted solutions of dangerous chemicals such as arsenic.
• If
you take a homeopathic remedy for a cold, headache, or other minor
problem, it may make you feel better—most likely because of the
placebo effect or simply because the ailment has run its course.
• Do
not take homeopathic remedies instead of proven medical treatments,
such as drugs to control cholesterol or blood sugar.
• A homeopathic
practitioner will almost certainly sell you remedies. The treatment
may go on indefinitely, and the costs can add up.
UC Berkeley
Wellness Letter, February 2006

|